Papers › Slope heuristics and V-Fold model selection in heteroscedastic regression using...
Slope heuristics and V-Fold model selection in heteroscedastic regression using strongly localized bases
Fabien Navarro, Adrien Saumard
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We investigate the optimality for model selection of the so-called slope heuristics, V-fold cross-validation and V-fold penalization in a heteroscedastic with random design regression context. We consider a new class of linear models that we call strongly localized bases and that generalize histograms, piecewise polynomials and compactly supported wavelets. We derive sharp oracle inequalities that prove the asymptotic optimality of the slope heuristics---when the optimal penalty shape is known---and V -fold penalization. Furthermore, V-fold cross-validation seems to be suboptimal for a fixed value of V since it recovers asymptotically the oracle learned from a sample size equal to 1-V⁻¹ of the original amount of data. Our results are based on genuine concentration inequalities for the true and empirical excess risks that are of independent interest. We show in our experiments the good behavior of the slope heuristics for the selection of linear wavelet models. Furthermore, V-fold cross-validation and V-fold penalization have comparable efficiency.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections