Papers › Single-index mixture cure model under monotonicity constraints
Single-index mixture cure model under monotonicity constraints
Eni Musta, Tsz Pang Yuen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We consider survival data in the presence of a cure fraction, meaning that some subjects will never experience the event of interest. We assume a mixture cure model consisting of two sub-models: one for the probability of being uncured (incidence) and one for the survival of the uncured subjects (latency). Various approaches, ranging from parametric to nonparametric, have been used to model the effect of covariates on the incidence, with the logistic model being the most common one. We propose a monotone single-index model for the incidence and introduce a new estimation method that is based on the profile maximum likelihood approach and techniques from isotonic regression. The monotone single-index structure relaxes the parametric logistic assumption while maintaining interpretability of the regression coefficients. We investigate the consistency of the proposed estimator and show through a simulation study that, when the monotonicity assumption is satisfied, it performs better compared to the non-constrained single-index/Cox mixture cure model. To illustrate its practical use, we use the new method to study melanoma cancer survival data.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections