Papers › Single Image Reflection Removal Exploiting Misaligned Training Data and Network Enhancements
Single Image Reflection Removal Exploiting Misaligned Training Data and Network Enhancements
Kaixuan Wei, Jiaolong Yang, Ying Fu, David Wipf, Hua Huang
Removing undesirable reflections from a single image captured through a glass window is of practical importance to visual computing systems. Although state-of-the-art methods can obtain decent results in certain situations, performance declines significantly when tackling more general real-world cases. These failures stem from the intrinsic difficulty of single image reflection removal -- the fundamental ill-posedness of the problem, and the insufficiency of densely-labeled training data needed for resolving this ambiguity within learning-based neural network pipelines. In this paper, we address these issues by exploiting targeted network enhancements and the novel use of misaligned data. For the former, we augment a baseline network architecture by embedding context encoding modules that are capable of leveraging high-level contextual clues to reduce indeterminacy within areas containing strong reflections. For the latter, we introduce an alignment-invariant loss function that facilitates exploiting misaligned real-world training data that is much easier to collect. Experimental results collectively show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art with aligned data, and that significant improvements are possible when using additional misaligned data.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1904.00637")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Vandermode/ERRNet. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
91bda7c651d2e3f7 · report
805fb9818f986a0d · report
fde6f58552ebe4f1 · report
573d768198fda403 · report
7a92eb4c93e6b804 · report
2c137d3584064330 · report
7702313c16b1182f · report
310ba2102b406358 · report
07f5bda268e05ef2 · report
5b0d0624510bbe25 · report
33442b837e557c99 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reflection Removal | Real20 | ERRNet | PSNR | 22.89 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | Real20 | ERRNet | SSIM | 0.803 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | SIR^2(Objects) | ERRNet | PSNR | 24.87 | #5 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | SIR^2(Objects) | ERRNet | SSIM | 0.896 | #5 of 7 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | SIR^2(Postcard) | ERRNet | PSNR | 22.04 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | SIR^2(Postcard) | ERRNet | SSIM | 0.876 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | SIR^2(Wild) | ERRNet | PSNR | 24.25 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Reflection Removal | SIR^2(Wild) | ERRNet | SSIM | 0.853 | #6 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections