Papers › Simulation Results on Selector Adaptation in Behavior Trees

Simulation Results on Selector Adaptation in Behavior Trees

29 Jun 2016arXiv:1606.09219links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Blake Hannaford, Danying Hu, Dianmu Zhang, Yangming Li

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Behavior trees (BTs) emerged from video game development as a graphical language for modeling intelligent agent behavior. However as initially implemented, behavior trees are static plans. This paper adds to recent literature exploring the ability of BTs to adapt to their success or failure in achieving tasks. The "Selector" node of a BT tries alternative strategies (its children) and returns success only if all of its children return failure. This paper studies several means by which Selector nodes can learn from experience, in particular, learn conditional probabilities of success based on sensor information, and modify the execution order based on the learned iformation. Furthermore, a "Greedy Selector" is studied which only tries the child having the highest success probability. Simulation results indicate significantly increased task performance, especially when frequentist probability estimate is conditioned on sensor information. The Greedy selector was ineffective unless it was preceded by a period of training in which all children were exercised.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections