Papers › Simple Techniques Work Surprisingly Well for Neural Network Test Prioritization and...

Simple Techniques Work Surprisingly Well for Neural Network Test Prioritization and Active Learning (Replicability Study)

2 May 2022arXiv:2205.00664archive 2025-07-28

Michael Weiss, Paolo Tonella

Test Input Prioritizers (TIP) for Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are an important technique to handle the typically very large test datasets efficiently, saving computation and labeling costs. This is particularly true for large-scale, deployed systems, where inputs observed in production are recorded to serve as potential test or training data for the next versions of the system. Feng et. al. propose DeepGini, a very fast and simple TIP, and show that it outperforms more elaborate techniques such as neuron- and surprise coverage. In a large-scale study (4 case studies, 8 test datasets, 32'200 trained models) we verify their findings. However, we also find that other comparable or even simpler baselines from the field of uncertainty quantification, such as the predicted softmax likelihood or the entropy of the predicted softmax likelihoods perform equally well as DeepGini.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2205.00664")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 6 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 6 samples from 3 repositories, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

testingautomated-usi/simple-tip officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtfMIT report
testingautomated-usi/corrupted-text officialmentioned in paperMIT report
testingautomated-usi/dnn-tip officialmentioned in paperMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

6unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

apfd_from_order testingautomated-usi/dnn-tip/dnn_tip/apfd.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 70dc3096f049e361 · report
bad_autocompletes testingautomated-usi/corrupted-text/corrupted_text/text_corruptor.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · b2242712c5801da0 · report
flatten_layers testingautomated-usi/dnn-tip/dnn_tip/neuron_coverage.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 6e861b8c094c0e69 · report
split_by_whitespace testingautomated-usi/corrupted-text/corrupted_text/text_corruptor.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 17beadc1b72498c1 · report
sum_score testingautomated-usi/dnn-tip/dnn_tip/neuron_coverage.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 398e8c1dcc9e87ef · report
sum_score testingautomated-usi/simple-tip/src/core/neuron_coverage.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 636ced33bf8ba5e7 · report

Tasks

Active LearningUncertainty Quantification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Softmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections