Papers › SIMPLE: Specialized Model-Sample Matching for Domain Generalization
SIMPLE: Specialized Model-Sample Matching for Domain Generalization
Ziyue Li, Kan Ren, Xinyang Jiang, Yifei Shen, Haipeng Zhang, Dongsheng Li
In domain generalization (DG), most existing methods aspire to fine-tune a specific pretrained model through novel DG algorithms. In this paper, we propose an alternative direction, i.e., to efficiently leverage a pool of pretrained models without fine-tuning. Through extensive empirical and theoretical evidence, we demonstrate that (1) pretrained models have possessed generalization to some extent while there is no single best pretrained model across all distribution shifts, and (2) out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization error depends on the fitness between the pretrained model and unseen test distributions. This analysis motivates us to incorporate diverse pretrained models and to dispatch the best matched models for each OOD sample by means of recommendation techniques. To this end, we propose SIMPLE, a specialized model-sample matching method for domain generalization. First, the predictions of pretrained models are adapted to the target domain by a linear label space transformation. A matching network aware of model specialty is then proposed to dynamically recommend proper pretrained models to predict each test sample. The experiments on DomainBed show that our method achieves significant performance improvements (up to 12.2% for individual dataset and 3.9% on average) compared to state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods and further achieves 6.1% gain via enlarging the pretrained model pool. Moreover, our method is highly efficient and achieves more than 1000 times training speedup compared to the conventional DG methods with fine-tuning a pretrained model. Code and supplemental materials are available at https://seqml.github.io/simple.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Generalization | DomainNet | SIMPLE+ | Average Accuracy | 61.9 | #7 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | DomainNet | SIMPLE | Average Accuracy | 49.2 | #23 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | Office-Home | SIMPLE+ | Average Accuracy | 87.7 | #4 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | Office-Home | SIMPLE | Average Accuracy | 84.6 | #8 of 45 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | PACS | SIMPLE+ | Average Accuracy | 99.0 | #1 of 133 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | PACS | SIMPLE | Average Accuracy | 88.6 | #27 of 133 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | TerraIncognita | SIMPLE+ | Average Accuracy | 59.0 | #7 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | TerraIncognita | SIMPLE | Average Accuracy | 57.6 | #9 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VLCS | SIMPLE+ | Average Accuracy | 82.7 | #8 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | VLCS | SIMPLE | Average Accuracy | 79.9 | #20 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections