Papers › Sequential Score Adaptation with Extreme Value Theory for Robust Railway Track Inspection

Sequential Score Adaptation with Extreme Value Theory for Robust Railway Track Inspection

20 Oct 2015arXiv:1510.05822archive 2025-07-28

Xavier Gibert, Vishal M. Patel, Rama Chellappa

Periodic inspections are necessary to keep railroad tracks in state of good repair and prevent train accidents. Automatic track inspection using machine vision technology has become a very effective inspection tool. Because of its non-contact nature, this technology can be deployed on virtually any railway vehicle to continuously survey the tracks and send exception reports to track maintenance personnel. However, as appearance and imaging conditions vary, false alarm rates can dramatically change, making it difficult to select a good operating point. In this paper, we use extreme value theory (EVT) within a Bayesian framework to optimally adjust the sensitivity of anomaly detectors. We show that by approximating the lower tail of the probability density function (PDF) of the scores with an Exponential distribution (a special case of the Generalized Pareto distribution), and using the Gamma conjugate prior learned from the training data, it is possible to reduce the variability in false alarm rate and improve the overall performance. This method has shown an increase in the defect detection rate of rail fasteners in the presence of clutter (at PFA 0.1%) from 95.40% to 99.26% on the 85-mile Northeast Corridor (NEC) 2012-2013 concrete tie dataset.

PaperPDFCode

Code

xavigibert/EvtTrack officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Defect Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections