Papers › Separating MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT
Separating MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT
Joshua Brakensiek, Neng Huang, Aaron Potechin, Uri Zwick
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), the best approximation ratio that can be obtained in polynomial time for the MAX CUT problem is α_(CUT)≃0.87856, obtained by the celebrated SDP-based approximation algorithm of Goemans and Williamson. The currently best approximation algorithm for MAX DI-CUT, i.e., the MAX CUT problem in directed graphs, achieves a ratio of about $0.87401$, leaving open the question whether MAX DI-CUT can be approximated as well as MAX CUT. We obtain a slightly improved algorithm for MAX DI-CUT and a new UGC-hardness result for it, showing that 0.87446≤α_(DI-CUT)≤0.87461, where α_(DI-CUT) is the best approximation ratio that can be obtained in polynomial time for MAX DI-CUT under UGC. The new upper bound separates MAX DI-CUT from MAX CUT, resolving a question raised by Feige and Goemans. A natural generalization of MAX DI-CUT is the MAX 2-AND problem in which each constraint is of the form z₁z₂, where z₁ and z₂ are literals, i.e., variables or their negations (In MAX DI-CUT each constraint is of the form x̅₁x₂, where x₁ and x₂ are variables.) Austrin separated MAX 2-AND from MAX CUT by showing that α_(2AND) < 0.87435 and conjectured that MAX 2-AND and MAX DI-CUT have the same approximation ratio. Our new lower bound on MAX DI-CUT refutes this conjecture, completing the separation of the three problems MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT. We also obtain a new lower bound for MAX 2-AND, showing that 0.87414≤α_(2AND)≤0.87435. Our upper bound on MAX DI-CUT is achieved via a simple, analytical proof. The lower bounds on MAX DI-CUT and MAX 2-AND (the new approximation algorithms) use experimentally-discovered distributions of rounding functions which are then verified via computer-assisted proofs.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections