Papers › Semantically Meaningful Metrics for Norwegian ASR Systems
Semantically Meaningful Metrics for Norwegian ASR Systems
Janine Rugayan, Torbjørn Svendsen, Giampiero Salvi
Evaluation metrics are important for quanitfying the performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems. However, the widely used word error rate (WER) captures errors at the word-level only and weighs each error equally, which makes it insufficient to discern ASR system performance for downstream tasks such as Natural Language Understanding (NLU) or information retrieval. We explore in this paper a more robust and discriminative evaluation metric for Norwegian ASR systems through the use of semantic information modeled by a transformer-based language model. We propose Aligned Semantic Distance (ASD) which employs dynamic programming to quantify the similarity between the reference and hypothesis text. First, embedding vectors are generated using the NorBERT model. Afterwards, the minimum global distance of the optimal alignment between these vectors is obtained and normalized by the sequence length of the reference embedding vector. In addition, we present results using Semantic Distance (SemDist), and compare them with ASD. Results show that for the same WER, ASD and SemDist values can vary significantly, thus, exemplifying that not all recognition errors can be considered equally important. We investigate the resulting data, and present examples which demonstrate the nuances of both metrics in evaluating various transcription errors.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections