Papers › SelfMatch: Combining Contrastive Self-Supervision and Consistency for Semi-Supervised Learning
SelfMatch: Combining Contrastive Self-Supervision and Consistency for Semi-Supervised Learning
Byoungjip Kim, Jinho Choo, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Seongho Joe, Seungjai Min, Youngjune Gwon
This paper introduces SelfMatch, a semi-supervised learning method that combines the power of contrastive self-supervised learning and consistency regularization. SelfMatch consists of two stages: (1) self-supervised pre-training based on contrastive learning and (2) semi-supervised fine-tuning based on augmentation consistency regularization. We empirically demonstrate that SelfMatch achieves the state-of-the-art results on standard benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-10 and SVHN. For example, for CIFAR-10 with 40 labeled examples, SelfMatch achieves 93.19% accuracy that outperforms the strong previous methods such as MixMatch (52.46%), UDA (70.95%), ReMixMatch (80.9%), and FixMatch (86.19%). We note that SelfMatch can close the gap between supervised learning (95.87%) and semi-supervised learning (93.19%) by using only a few labels for each class.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 250 Labels | SelfMatch | Percentage error | 4.87±0.26 | #12 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 40 Labels | SelfMatch | Percentage error | 6.81±1.08 | #14 of 21 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | SelfMatch | Percentage error | 4.06±0.08 | #8 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections