Papers › Self-Tuning Spectral Clustering for Speaker Diarization

Self-Tuning Spectral Clustering for Speaker Diarization

16 Sep 2024arXiv:2410.00023archive 2025-07-28

Nikhil Raghav, Avisek Gupta, Md Sahidullah, Swagatam Das

Spectral clustering has proven effective in grouping speech representations for speaker diarization tasks, although post-processing the affinity matrix remains difficult due to the need for careful tuning before constructing the Laplacian. In this study, we present a novel pruning algorithm to create a sparse affinity matrix called spectral clustering on p-neighborhood retained affinity matrix (SC-pNA). Our method improves on node-specific fixed neighbor selection by allowing a variable number of neighbors, eliminating the need for external tuning data as the pruning parameters are derived directly from the affinity matrix. SC-pNA does so by identifying two clusters in every row of the initial affinity matrix, and retains only the top p % similarity scores from the cluster containing larger similarities. Spectral clustering is performed subsequently, with the number of clusters determined as the maximum eigengap. Experimental results on the challenging DIHARD-III dataset highlight the superiority of SC-pNA, which is also computationally more efficient than existing auto-tuning approaches. Our implementations are available at https://github.com/nikhilraghav29/SC-pNA.

PaperPDFCode

Code

nikhilraghav29/sc-pna officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ClusteringSpeaker Diarizationspeaker-diarization

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

PruningSpectral Clustering

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections