Papers › Selecting Features for Markov Modeling: A Case Study on HP35
Selecting Features for Markov Modeling: A Case Study on HP35
Daniel Nagel, Sofia Sartore, Gerhard Stock
Markov state models represent a popular means to interpret molecular dynamics trajectories in terms of memoryless transitions between metastable conformational states. To provide a mechanistic understanding of the considered biomolecular process, these states should reflect structurally distinct conformations and ensure a timescale separation between fast intrastate and slow interstate dynamics. Adopting the folding of villin headpiece (HP35) as a well-established model problem, here we discuss the selection of suitable input coordinates or `features', such as backbone dihedral angles and interresidue distances. We show that dihedral angles account accurately for the structure of the native energy basin of HP35, while the unfolded region of the free energy landscape and the folding process are best described by tertiary contacts of the protein. To construct a contact-based model, we consider various ways to define and select contact distances, and introduce a low-pass filtering of the feature trajectory as well as a correlation-based characterization of states. Relying on input data that faithfully account for the mechanistic origin of the studied process, the states of the resulting Markov model are clearly discriminated by the features, describe consistently the hierarchical structure of the free energy landscape, and0x2014as a consequence0x2014correctly reproduce the slow timescales of the process.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections