Papers › Seeking dark matter with γ-ray attenuation
Seeking dark matter with γ-ray attenuation
José Luis Bernal, Andrea Caputo, Gabriela Sato-Polito, Jordan Mirocha, Marc Kamionkowski
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The flux of high-energy astrophysical γ rays is attenuated by the production of electron-positron pairs from scattering off of extragalactic background light (EBL). We use the most up-to-date information on galaxy populations to compute their contributions to the pair-production optical depth. We find that the optical depth inferred from γ-ray measurements exceeds that expected from galaxies at the ∼2σ level. If the excess is modeled as a frequency-independent re-scaling of the standard contribution to the EBL from galaxies, then an excess (an overall 14-30% increase of the EBL) over the null hypothesis of no excess at the 2.7σ level. If the frequency dependence of the excess is instead modeled as a two-photon decay of a dark-matter axion, then the excess is favored over the null hypothesis at the 2.1σ confidence level. While we find no evidence for a dark-matter signal, the analysis sets the strongest current bounds on the photon-axion coupling over the 8-25 eV mass range. This work highlights the sensitivity of γ-ray optical depth measurements to ALPs, which is expected to improve with new observatories and better EBL determinations from future observations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections