Papers › Seedream 2.0: A Native Chinese-English Bilingual Image Generation Foundation Model

Seedream 2.0: A Native Chinese-English Bilingual Image Generation Foundation Model

10 Mar 2025arXiv:2503.07703archive 2025-07-28

Lixue Gong, Xiaoxia Hou, Fanshi Li, Liang Li, Xiaochen Lian, Fei Liu, Liyang Liu, Wei Liu, Wei Lu, Yichun Shi, Shiqi Sun, Yu Tian, Zhi Tian, Peng Wang, Xun Wang, Ye Wang, Guofeng Wu, Jie Wu, Xin Xia, Xuefeng Xiao, Linjie Yang, Zhonghua Zhai, Xinyu Zhang, Qi Zhang, Yuwei Zhang, Shijia Zhao, Jianchao Yang, Weilin Huang

Rapid advancement of diffusion models has catalyzed remarkable progress in the field of image generation. However, prevalent models such as Flux, SD3.5 and Midjourney, still grapple with issues like model bias, limited text rendering capabilities, and insufficient understanding of Chinese cultural nuances. To address these limitations, we present Seedream 2.0, a native Chinese-English bilingual image generation foundation model that excels across diverse dimensions, which adeptly manages text prompt in both Chinese and English, supporting bilingual image generation and text rendering. We develop a powerful data system that facilitates knowledge integration, and a caption system that balances the accuracy and richness for image description. Particularly, Seedream is integrated with a self-developed bilingual large language model as a text encoder, allowing it to learn native knowledge directly from massive data. This enable it to generate high-fidelity images with accurate cultural nuances and aesthetic expressions described in either Chinese or English. Beside, Glyph-Aligned ByT5 is applied for flexible character-level text rendering, while a Scaled ROPE generalizes well to untrained resolutions. Multi-phase post-training optimizations, including SFT and RLHF iterations, further improve the overall capability. Through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate that Seedream 2.0 achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple aspects, including prompt-following, aesthetics, text rendering, and structural correctness. Furthermore, Seedream 2.0 has been optimized through multiple RLHF iterations to closely align its output with human preferences, as revealed by its outstanding ELO score. In addition, it can be readily adapted to an instruction-based image editing model, such as SeedEdit, with strong editing capability that balances instruction-following and image consistency.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2503.07703")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 13 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 13 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

DYEvaLab/EvalMuse mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

13 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
3ran
9unverified

Licence: 0 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from DYEvaLab/EvalMuse. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

interpolate_pos_embed DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/lavis/models/vit.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · c6ec173f19f5c34d · report
logistic_func DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/NTIRE2025/Track1_Alignment/evaluate.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · eecc2b52c51e67dc · report
node_to_dict DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/lavis/common/config.py community (archive-listed) ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 791c72070c0b1cfb · report
tile DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/lavis/models/base_model.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · cb33571427334815 · report
all_gather_with_grad DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/lavis/models/base_model.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 0ec9fc2025c16f65 · report
calculate_score DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/NTIRE2025/Track1_Alignment/evaluate.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a33274f4811ba44b · report
compute_metrics DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/NTIRE2025/Track1_Alignment/evaluate.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · c398976e864ca923 · report
find_connected_components DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/NTIRE2025/Track2_Structure/evaluate.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3ce6f2c660bdd4d5 · report
get_plcc_srcc DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/NTIRE2025/Track2_Structure/evaluate.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 157d2a06ef6e5db1 · report
is_sublist DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/process/element2mask.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 39c7582f0f751221 · report
load_csv_as_dict_list DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 7a749446072d47a6 · report
load_data DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 43ad22367a932664 · report
load_json_as_dict_list DYEvaLab/EvalMuse/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 7c83ce9ecb81c347 · report

Tasks

Image GenerationInstruction FollowingLarge Language Model

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ALIGNDiffusionSFT

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections