Papers › SciInstruct: a Self-Reflective Instruction Annotated Dataset for Training Scientific...

SciInstruct: a Self-Reflective Instruction Annotated Dataset for Training Scientific Language Models

15 Jan 2024arXiv:2401.07950archive 2025-07-28

Dan Zhang, Ziniu Hu, Sining Zhoubian, Zhengxiao Du, Kaiyu Yang, Zihan Wang, Yisong Yue, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in assisting scientific discovery. However, such applications are currently limited by LLMs' deficiencies in understanding intricate scientific concepts, deriving symbolic equations, and solving advanced numerical calculations. To bridge these gaps, we introduce SciInstruct, a suite of scientific instructions for training scientific language models capable of college-level scientific reasoning. Central to our approach is a novel self-reflective instruction annotation framework to address the data scarcity challenge in the science domain. This framework leverages existing LLMs to generate step-by-step reasoning for unlabelled scientific questions, followed by a process of self-reflective critic-and-revise. Applying this framework, we curated a diverse and high-quality dataset encompassing physics, chemistry, math, and formal proofs. We analyze the curated SciInstruct from multiple interesting perspectives (e.g., domain, scale, source, question type, answer length, etc.). To verify the effectiveness of SciInstruct, we fine-tuned different language models with SciInstruct, i.e., ChatGLM3 (6B and 32B), Llama3-8B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B: MetaMath, enhancing their scientific and mathematical reasoning capabilities, without sacrificing the language understanding capabilities of the base model. We release all codes and SciInstruct at https://github.com/THUDM/SciGLM.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2401.07950")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 5 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

thudm/sciglm officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
5ran
1unverified

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from THUDM/SciGLM. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

build_prompt THUDM/SciGLM/inference/cli_demo.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 938a3cf8db709378 · report
eval thudm/sciglm/evaluation/SciEval/evaluate_SciEval.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · b50f9d8043b40d41 · report
get_label thudm/sciglm/self_reflective_annotation/gpt_labeling/gpt_judge.py official repository ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 6c4c3157688289fd · report
gpt_usage thudm/sciglm/evaluation/SciEval/models.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · 8ccd0ed4e4557aa8 · report
is_choice thudm/sciglm/self_reflective_annotation/reflective_generation/api_gen_gpt_revise.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · eb4df61bb116b17c · report
read_json THUDM/SciGLM/self_reflective_annotation/reflective_generation/api_gen_gpt.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · dae309af08c4bf0a · report
read_json thudm/sciglm/self_reflective_annotation/reflective_generation/api_gen_gpt_revise.py official repository ran no licence file found · pointer only · fb4b23e8ddc8bc80 · report
read_json thudm/sciglm/self_reflective_annotation/data_classifier/rm_eval.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 8b94a0e33c0124ec · report

Tasks

MathMathematical Reasoningscientific discovery

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

BASE

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections