Papers › Scaling Up Resonate-and-Fire Networks for Fast Deep Learning

Scaling Up Resonate-and-Fire Networks for Fast Deep Learning

1 Apr 2025arXiv:2504.00719archive 2025-07-28

Thomas E. Huber, Jules Lecomte, Borislav Polovnikov, Axel von Arnim

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) present a promising computing paradigm for neuromorphic processing of event-based sensor data. The resonate-and-fire (RF) neuron, in particular, appeals through its biological plausibility, complex dynamics, yet computational simplicity. Despite theoretically predicted benefits, challenges in parameter initialization and efficient learning inhibited the implementation of RF networks, constraining their use to a single layer. In this paper, we address these shortcomings by deriving the RF neuron as a structured state space model (SSM) from the HiPPO framework. We introduce S5-RF, a new SSM layer comprised of RF neurons based on the S5 model, that features a generic initialization scheme and fast training within a deep architecture. S5-RF scales for the first time a RF network to a deep SNN with up to four layers and achieves with 78.8% a new state-of-the-art result for recurrent SNNs on the Spiking Speech Commands dataset in under three hours of training time. Moreover, compared to the reference SNNs that solve our benchmarking tasks, it achieves similar performance with much fewer spiking operations. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ThomasEHuber/s5-rf.

PaperPDFCode

Code

thomasehuber/s5-rf officialmentioned in paperjax report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BenchmarkingDeep Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SNN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections