Papers › ScalerEval: Automated and Consistent Evaluation Testbed for Auto-scalers in Microservices

ScalerEval: Automated and Consistent Evaluation Testbed for Auto-scalers in Microservices

11 Apr 2025arXiv:2504.08308links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Shuaiyu Xie, Jian Wang, Yang Luo, Yunqing Yong, Yuzhen Tan, Bing Li

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Auto-scaling is an automated approach that dynamically provisions resources for microservices to accommodate fluctuating workloads. Despite the introduction of many sophisticated auto-scaling algorithms, evaluating auto-scalers remains time-consuming and labor-intensive, as it requires the implementation of numerous fundamental interfaces, complex manual operations, and in-depth domain knowledge. Besides, frequent human intervention can inevitably introduce operational errors, leading to inconsistencies in the evaluation of different auto-scalers. To address these issues, we present ScalerEval, an end-to-end automated and consistent testbed for auto-scalers in microservices. ScalerEval integrates essential fundamental interfaces for implementation of auto-scalers and further orchestrates a one-click evaluation workflow for researchers. The source code is publicly available at \href{https://github.com/WHU-AISE/ScalerEval}{https://github.com/WHU-AISE/ScalerEval}.

PaperPDFCode

Code

whu-aise/scalereval officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections