Papers › Scalable random number generation for truncated log-concave distributions

Scalable random number generation for truncated log-concave distributions

4 Apr 2022arXiv:2204.01364links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Lambardi di San Miniato, Michele, Kenne Pagui, Euloge Clovis

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Inverse transform sampling is an exceptionally general method to generate non-uniform-distributed random numbers, but can be rather unstable when simulating extremely truncated distributions. Many famous probability models share a property called log-concavity, which is not affected by truncation, so they can all be simulated via rejection sampling using Devroye's approach. This sampler is based on rejection and thus more stable than inverse transform, and uses a very simple envelope whose acceptance rate is guaranteed to be at least 20\%. The aim of this paper is threefold: firstly, to warn against the risk of wrongly simulating from truncated distributions; secondly, to motivate a more extensive use of rejection sampling to mitigate the issues; lastly, to motivate Devroye's automatic method as a practical standard in the case of log-concave distributions. We illustrate the proposal by means of simulations based on some Tweedie distributions, for their relevance in regression analysis.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mlambardi/trunclcdist officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections