Papers › SCAF: Skip-Connections in Auto-encoder for Face alignment with few annotated data
SCAF: Skip-Connections in Auto-encoder for Face alignment with few annotated data
Martin Dornier, Philippe-Henri Gosselin, Christian Raymond, Yann Ricquebourg, Bertrand Coüasnon
Supervised face alignment methods need large amounts of training data to achieve good performance in terms of accuracy and generalization. However face alignment datasets rarely exceed a few thousand samples making these methods prone to overfitting on the specific training dataset. Semi-supervised methods like TS3 or 3FabRec have emerged to alleviate this issue by using labeled and unlabeled data during the training. In this paper we propose Skip-Connections in Auto-encoder for Face alignment (SCAF), we build on 3FabRec by adding skip-connections between the encoder and the decoder. These skip-connections lead to better landmark predictions, especially on challenging examples. We also apply for the first time active learning to the face alignment task and introduce a new acquisition function, the Negative Neighborhood Magnitude, specially designed to assess the quality of heatmaps. These two proposals show their effectiveness on several face alignment datasets when training with limited data.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face Alignment | 300W | SCAF | NME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge) | 5.83 | #35 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | 300W | SCAF | NME_inter-ocular (%, Common) | 3.48 | #35 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | 300W | SCAF | NME_inter-ocular (%, Full) | 3.95 | #35 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFLW | SCAF | NME (inter-ocular) | 5.50 | #30 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections