Papers › Sample-efficient neural likelihood-free Bayesian inference of implicit HMMs

Sample-efficient neural likelihood-free Bayesian inference of implicit HMMs

2 May 2024arXiv:2405.01737archive 2025-07-28

Sanmitra Ghosh, Paul J. Birrell, Daniela De Angelis

Likelihood-free inference methods based on neural conditional density estimation were shown to drastically reduce the simulation burden in comparison to classical methods such as ABC. When applied in the context of any latent variable model, such as a Hidden Markov model (HMM), these methods are designed to only estimate the parameters, rather than the joint distribution of the parameters and the hidden states. Naive application of these methods to a HMM, ignoring the inference of this joint posterior distribution, will thus produce an inaccurate estimate of the posterior predictive distribution, in turn hampering the assessment of goodness-of-fit. To rectify this problem, we propose a novel, sample-efficient likelihood-free method for estimating the high-dimensional hidden states of an implicit HMM. Our approach relies on learning directly the intractable posterior distribution of the hidden states, using an autoregressive-flow, by exploiting the Markov property. Upon evaluating our approach on some implicit HMMs, we found that the quality of the estimates retrieved using our method is comparable to what can be achieved using a much more computationally expensive SMC algorithm.

PaperPDFCode

Code

sg5g10/hmm officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Bayesian InferenceDensity Estimation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ABC

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections