Papers › Sample-Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learning with Off-Policy Critics

Sample-Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learning with Off-Policy Critics

11 Mar 2019arXiv:1903.04193archive 2025-07-28

Denis Steckelmacher, Hélène Plisnier, Diederik M. Roijers, Ann Nowé

Value-based reinforcement-learning algorithms provide state-of-the-art results in model-free discrete-action settings, and tend to outperform actor-critic algorithms. We argue that actor-critic algorithms are limited by their need for an on-policy critic. We propose Bootstrapped Dual Policy Iteration (BDPI), a novel model-free reinforcement-learning algorithm for continuous states and discrete actions, with an actor and several off-policy critics. Off-policy critics are compatible with experience replay, ensuring high sample-efficiency, without the need for off-policy corrections. The actor, by slowly imitating the average greedy policy of the critics, leads to high-quality and state-specific exploration, which we compare to Thompson sampling. Because the actor and critics are fully decoupled, BDPI is remarkably stable, and unusually robust to its hyper-parameters. BDPI is significantly more sample-efficient than Bootstrapped DQN, PPO, and ACKTR, on discrete, continuous and pixel-based tasks. Source code: https://github.com/vub-ai-lab/bdpi.

PaperPDFCode

Code

vub-ai-lab/bdpi officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Reinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)Thompson Samplingreinforcement-learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ConvolutionDQNDense ConnectionsEntropy RegularizationPPOQ-Learning

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections