Papers › SAFE-SiP: Secure Authentication Framework for System-in-Package Using Multi-party Computation

SAFE-SiP: Secure Authentication Framework for System-in-Package Using Multi-party Computation

13 May 2025arXiv:2505.09002links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ishraq Tashdid, Tasnuva Farheen, Sazadur Rahman

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The emergence of chiplet-based heterogeneous integration is transforming the semiconductor, AI, and high-performance computing industries by enabling modular designs and improved scalability. However, assembling chiplets from multiple vendors after fabrication introduces a complex supply chain that raises serious security concerns, including counterfeiting, overproduction, and unauthorized access. Current solutions often depend on dedicated security chiplets or changes to the timing flow, which assume a trusted SiP integrator. This assumption can expose chiplet signatures to other vendors and create new attack surfaces. This work addresses those vulnerabilities using Multi-party Computation (MPC), which enables zero-trust authentication without disclosing sensitive information to any party. We present SAFE-SiP, a scalable authentication framework that garbles chiplet signatures and uses MPC for verifying integrity, effectively blocking unauthorized access and adversarial inference. SAFE-SiP removes the need for a dedicated security chiplet and ensures secure authentication, even in untrusted integration scenarios. We evaluated SAFE-SiP on five RISC-V-based System-in-Package (SiP) designs. Experimental results show that SAFE-SiP incurs minimal power overhead, an average area overhead of only 3.05%, and maintains a computational complexity of 2^192, offering a highly efficient and scalable security solution.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ishraqatucf/safe_sip officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections