Papers › Safe Robot Navigation via Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection

Safe Robot Navigation via Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection

22 Jan 2020arXiv:2001.07934links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Lorenz Wellhausen, René Ranftl, Marco Hutter

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Navigation in natural outdoor environments requires a robust and reliable traversability classification method to handle the plethora of situations a robot can encounter. Binary classification algorithms perform well in their native domain but tend to provide overconfident predictions when presented with out-of-distribution samples, which can lead to catastrophic failure when navigating unknown environments. We propose to overcome this issue by using anomaly detection on multi-modal images for traversability classification, which is easily scalable by training in a self-supervised fashion from robot experience. In this work, we evaluate multiple anomaly detection methods with a combination of uni- and multi-modal images in their performance on data from different environmental conditions. Our results show that an approach using a feature extractor and normalizing flow with an input of RGB, depth and surface normals performs best. It achieves over 95% area under the ROC curve and is robust to out-of-distribution samples.

PaperPDFCode

Code

leggedrobotics/anomaly_navigation officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections