Papers › Saddlepoint approximations in binary genome-wide association studies
Saddlepoint approximations in binary genome-wide association studies
Pål Vegard Johnsen, Øyvind Bakke, Thea Bjørnland, Andrew Thomas DeWan, Mette Langaas
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We investigate saddlepoint approximations applied to the score test statistic in genome-wide association studies with binary phenotypes. The inaccuracy in the normal approximation of the score test statistic increases with increasing sample imbalance and with decreasing minor allele count. Applying saddlepoint approximations to the score test statistic distribution greatly improve the accuracy, even far out in the tail of the distribution. By using exact results for an intercept model and binary covariate model, as well as simulations for models with nuisance parameters, we emphasize the need for continuity corrections in order to achieve valid p-values. The performance of the saddlepoint approximations is evaluated by overall and conditional type I error rate on simulated data. We investigate the methods further by using data from UK Biobank with skin and soft tissue infections as phenotype, using both common and rare variants. The analysis confirms that continuity correction is important particularly for rare variants, and that the normal approximation gives a highly inflated type I error rate for case imbalance.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections