Papers › Runtime vs Scheduler: Analyzing Dask's Overheads
Runtime vs Scheduler: Analyzing Dask's Overheads
Stanislav Böhm, Jakub Beránek
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Dask is a distributed task framework which is commonly used by data scientists to parallelize Python code on computing clusters with little programming effort. It uses a sophisticated work-stealing scheduler which has been hand-tuned to execute task graphs as efficiently as possible. But is scheduler optimization a worthwhile effort for Dask? Our paper shows on many real world task graphs that even a completely random scheduler is surprisingly competitive with its built-in scheduler and that the main bottleneck of Dask lies in its runtime overhead. We develop a drop-in replacement for the Dask central server written in Rust which is backwards compatible with existing Dask programs. Thanks to its efficient runtime, our server implementation is able to scale up to larger clusters than Dask and consistently outperforms it on a variety of task graphs, despite the fact that it uses a simpler scheduling algorithm.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections