Papers › Ruminating Reader: Reasoning with Gated Multi-Hop Attention

Ruminating Reader: Reasoning with Gated Multi-Hop Attention

24 Apr 2017WS 2018 7arXiv:1704.07415archive 2025-07-28

Yichen Gong, Samuel R. Bowman

To answer the question in machine comprehension (MC) task, the models need to establish the interaction between the question and the context. To tackle the problem that the single-pass model cannot reflect on and correct its answer, we present Ruminating Reader. Ruminating Reader adds a second pass of attention and a novel information fusion component to the Bi-Directional Attention Flow model (BiDAF). We propose novel layer structures that construct an query-aware context vector representation and fuse encoding representation with intermediate representation on top of BiDAF model. We show that a multi-hop attention mechanism can be applied to a bi-directional attention structure. In experiments on SQuAD, we find that the Reader outperforms the BiDAF baseline by a substantial margin, and matches or surpasses the performance of all other published systems.

PaperPDFConference PDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Question AnsweringReading Comprehension

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Question Answering SQuAD1.1 Ruminating Reader (single model) EM 70.639 #159 of 213 Archive leaderboard report
Question Answering SQuAD1.1 Ruminating Reader (single model) F1 79.456 #159 of 213 Archive leaderboard report
Question Answering SQuAD1.1 dev Ruminating Reader EM 70.6 #36 of 55 Archive leaderboard report
Question Answering SQuAD1.1 dev Ruminating Reader F1 79.5 #36 of 55 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections