Papers › Rudder: A Cross Lingual Video and Text Retrieval Dataset
Rudder: A Cross Lingual Video and Text Retrieval Dataset
Jayaprakash A, abhishek, Rishabh Dabral, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Preethi Jyothi
Video retrieval using natural language queries requires learning semantically meaningful joint embeddings between the text and the audio-visual input. Often, such joint embeddings are learnt using pairwise (or triplet) contrastive loss objectives which cannot give enough attention to 'difficult-to-retrieve' samples during training. This problem is especially pronounced in data-scarce settings where the data is relatively small (10% of the large scale MSR-VTT) to cover the rather complex audio-visual embedding space. In this context, we introduce Rudder - a multilingual video-text retrieval dataset that includes audio and textual captions in Marathi, Hindi, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam and Telugu. Furthermore, we propose to compensate for data scarcity by using domain knowledge to augment supervision. To this end, in addition to the conventional three samples of a triplet (anchor, positive, and negative), we introduce a fourth term - a partial - to define a differential margin based partialorder loss. The partials are heuristically sampled such that they semantically lie in the overlap zone between the positives and the negatives, thereby resulting in broader embedding coverage. Our proposals consistently outperform the conventional max-margin and triplet losses and improve the state-of-the-art on MSR-VTT and DiDeMO datasets. We report benchmark results on Rudder while also observing significant gains using the proposed partial order loss, especially when the language specific retrieval models are jointly trained by availing the cross-lingual alignment across the language-specific datasets.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | text-to-video Mean Rank | 162.3 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | text-to-video Median Rank | 77 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | text-to-video R@1 | 3.6 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | text-to-video R@10 | 15.9 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | video-to-text Mean Rank | 164.6 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | video-to-text Median Rank | 83 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | video-to-text R@1 | 3.2 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | Charades-STA | PO Loss | video-to-text R@10 | 14.9 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | text-to-video Mean Rank | 40.2 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | text-to-video Median Rank | 8 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | text-to-video R@1 | 16.3 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | text-to-video R@10 | 56.5 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | video-to-text Mean Rank | 39.6 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | video-to-text Median Rank | 8 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | video-to-text R@1 | 15 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | DiDeMo | PO Loss | video-to-text R@10 | 54.9 | #38 of 40 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | text-to-video Mean Rank | 66 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | text-to-video Median Rank | 153.14 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | text-to-video R@1 | 4.48 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | text-to-video R@10 | 20.02 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | text-to-video R@5 | 13.47 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | text-to-video R@50 | 42.49 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | video-to-text Mean Rank | 73 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | video-to-text Median Rank | 151.63 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | video-to-text R@1 | 3.87 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | video-to-text R@10 | 19.09 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Video Retrieval | RUDDER | PO Loss | video-to-text R@5 | 12.13 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections