Papers › Rudder: A Cross Lingual Video and Text Retrieval Dataset

Rudder: A Cross Lingual Video and Text Retrieval Dataset

9 Mar 2021arXiv:2103.05457archive 2025-07-28

Jayaprakash A, abhishek, Rishabh Dabral, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Preethi Jyothi

Video retrieval using natural language queries requires learning semantically meaningful joint embeddings between the text and the audio-visual input. Often, such joint embeddings are learnt using pairwise (or triplet) contrastive loss objectives which cannot give enough attention to 'difficult-to-retrieve' samples during training. This problem is especially pronounced in data-scarce settings where the data is relatively small (10% of the large scale MSR-VTT) to cover the rather complex audio-visual embedding space. In this context, we introduce Rudder - a multilingual video-text retrieval dataset that includes audio and textual captions in Marathi, Hindi, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam and Telugu. Furthermore, we propose to compensate for data scarcity by using domain knowledge to augment supervision. To this end, in addition to the conventional three samples of a triplet (anchor, positive, and negative), we introduce a fourth term - a partial - to define a differential margin based partialorder loss. The partials are heuristically sampled such that they semantically lie in the overlap zone between the positives and the negatives, thereby resulting in broader embedding coverage. Our proposals consistently outperform the conventional max-margin and triplet losses and improve the state-of-the-art on MSR-VTT and DiDeMO datasets. We report benchmark results on Rudder while also observing significant gains using the proposed partial order loss, especially when the language specific retrieval models are jointly trained by availing the cross-lingual alignment across the language-specific datasets.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

nshubham655/RUDDER officialpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Natural Language QueriesRetrievalText RetrievalVideo RetrievalVideo-Text Retrieval

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss text-to-video Mean Rank 162.3 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss text-to-video Median Rank 77 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss text-to-video R@1 3.6 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss text-to-video R@10 15.9 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss video-to-text Mean Rank 164.6 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss video-to-text Median Rank 83 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss video-to-text R@1 3.2 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval Charades-STA PO Loss video-to-text R@10 14.9 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss text-to-video Mean Rank 40.2 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss text-to-video Median Rank 8 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss text-to-video R@1 16.3 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss text-to-video R@10 56.5 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss video-to-text Mean Rank 39.6 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss video-to-text Median Rank 8 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss video-to-text R@1 15 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval DiDeMo PO Loss video-to-text R@10 54.9 #38 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss text-to-video Mean Rank 66 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss text-to-video Median Rank 153.14 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss text-to-video R@1 4.48 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss text-to-video R@10 20.02 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss text-to-video R@5 13.47 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss text-to-video R@50 42.49 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss video-to-text Mean Rank 73 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss video-to-text Median Rank 151.63 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss video-to-text R@1 3.87 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss video-to-text R@10 19.09 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Video Retrieval RUDDER PO Loss video-to-text R@5 12.13 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections