Papers › RS5M and GeoRSCLIP: A Large Scale Vision-Language Dataset and A Large Vision-Language...
RS5M and GeoRSCLIP: A Large Scale Vision-Language Dataset and A Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensing
Zilun Zhang, Tiancheng Zhao, Yulong Guo, Jianwei Yin
Pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) utilizing extensive image-text paired data have demonstrated unprecedented image-text association capabilities, achieving remarkable results across various downstream tasks. A critical challenge is how to make use of existing large-scale pre-trained VLMs, which are trained on common objects, to perform the domain-specific transfer for accomplishing domain-related downstream tasks. A critical challenge is how to make use of existing large-scale pre-trained VLMs, which are trained on common objects, to perform the domain-specific transfer for accomplishing domain-related downstream tasks. In this paper, we propose a new framework that includes the Domain pre-trained Vision-Language Model (DVLM), bridging the gap between the General Vision-Language Model (GVLM) and domain-specific downstream tasks. Moreover, we present an image-text paired dataset in the field of remote sensing (RS), RS5M, which has 5 million RS images with English descriptions. The dataset is obtained from filtering publicly available image-text paired datasets and captioning label-only RS datasets with pre-trained VLM. These constitute the first large-scale RS image-text paired dataset. Additionally, we fine-tuned the CLIP model and tried several Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods on RS5M to implement the DVLM. Experimental results show that our proposed dataset is highly effective for various tasks, and our model GeoRSCLIP improves upon the baseline or previous state-of-the-art model by 3%∼20% in Zero-shot Classification (ZSC), 3%∼6% in Remote Sensing Cross-Modal Text-Image Retrieval (RSCTIR) and 4%∼5% in Semantic Localization (SeLo) tasks. Dataset and models have been released in: \url{https://github.com/om-ai-lab/RS5M}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2306.11300")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run.
By repository: official repository: 7 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
7 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from om-ai-lab/rs5m. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e422ef5eabd3e2d3 · report
0106dca5c51f8f1e · report
efe314157da16dc0 · report
070fc16100b59dfe · report
adca0be395aff485 · report
1e7ca5b9b019d5bf · report
52f9aa6edd7ad06f · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-Modal Retrieval | RSICD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | Image-to-text R@1 | 21.13% | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Cross-Modal Retrieval | RSICD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | Mean Recall | 38.87% | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Cross-Modal Retrieval | RSICD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | text-to-image R@1 | 15.59% | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Cross-Modal Retrieval | RSITMD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | Image-to-text R@1 | 32.30% | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Cross-Modal Retrieval | RSITMD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | Mean Recall | 51.81% | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Cross-Modal Retrieval | RSITMD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | text-to-imageR@1 | 25.04% | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image-to-Text Retrieval | RSICD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | Image to Text Recall@1 | 22.14% | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Retrieval | RSICD | GeoRSCLIP-FT | Recall@1 | 15.59% | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections