Papers › ROS and Buzz: consensus-based behaviors for heterogeneous teams
ROS and Buzz: consensus-based behaviors for heterogeneous teams
David St-Onge, Vivek Shankar Varadharajan, Guannan Li, Ivan Svogor, Giovanni Beltrame
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
This paper address the challenges encountered by developers when deploying a distributed decision-making behavior on heterogeneous robotic systems. Many applications benefit from the use of multiple robots, but their scalability and applicability are fundamentally limited if relying on a central control station. Getting beyond the centralized approach can increase the complexity of the embedded intelligence, the sensitivity to the network topology, and render the deployment on physical robots tedious and error-prone. By integrating the swarm-oriented programming language Buzz with the standard environment of ROS, this work demonstrates that behaviors requiring distributed consensus can be successfully deployed in practice. From simulation to the field, the behavioral script stays untouched and applicable to heterogeneous robot teams. We present the software structure of our solution as well as the swarm-oriented paradigms required from Buzz to implement a robust generic consensus strategy. We show the applicability of our solution with simulations and experiments with heterogeneous ground-and-air robotic teams.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections