Papers › Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterization

Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterization

28 Feb 2022arXiv:2202.14026archive 2025-07-28

Sheng Liu, Zhihui Zhu, Qing Qu, Chong You

Recently, over-parameterized deep networks, with increasingly more network parameters than training samples, have dominated the performances of modern machine learning. However, when the training data is corrupted, it has been well-known that over-parameterized networks tend to overfit and do not generalize. In this work, we propose a principled approach for robust training of over-parameterized deep networks in classification tasks where a proportion of training labels are corrupted. The main idea is yet very simple: label noise is sparse and incoherent with the network learned from clean data, so we model the noise and learn to separate it from the data. Specifically, we model the label noise via another sparse over-parameterization term, and exploit implicit algorithmic regularizations to recover and separate the underlying corruptions. Remarkably, when trained using such a simple method in practice, we demonstrate state-of-the-art test accuracy against label noise on a variety of real datasets. Furthermore, our experimental results are corroborated by theory on simplified linear models, showing that exact separation between sparse noise and low-rank data can be achieved under incoherent conditions. The work opens many interesting directions for improving over-parameterized models by using sparse over-parameterization and implicit regularization.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2202.14026")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 8 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

shengliu66/sop officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
7unverified

Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from shengliu66/sop. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

conv3x3 shengliu66/sop/model/PreResNet.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 583f9780bdd00a45 · report
PreActResNet18 shengliu66/sop/model/PreResNet.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · bf41d63bb259c163 · report
PreActResNet34 shengliu66/sop/model/PreResNet.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 02b18cf6e0d7cce3 · report
my_metric shengliu66/sop/model/metric.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · fcdafb2d7a652e72 · report
my_metric2 shengliu66/sop/model/metric.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 59b71f69bd6a8f48 · report
reparameterization shengliu66/sop/model/model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 9cd740bf0656a73b · report
resnet18 shengliu66/sop/model/model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · d5e13047b38dd880 · report
resnet34 shengliu66/sop/model/model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 67bdfe590fc7f803 · report

Tasks

Learning with noisy labels

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-100N SOP+ Accuracy (mean) 67.81 #5 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Aggregate SOP+ Accuracy (mean) 95.61 #4 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random1 SOP+ Accuracy (mean) 95.28 #4 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random2 SOP Accuracy (mean) 95.31 #2 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random3 SOP+ Accuracy (mean) 95.39 #2 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Worst SOP+ Accuracy (mean) 93.24 #5 of 25 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections