Papers › Robust Target Training for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation

Robust Target Training for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation

4 Oct 2022arXiv:2210.01676archive 2025-07-28

Zhongying Deng, Da Li, Yi-Zhe Song, Tao Xiang

Given multiple labeled source domains and a single target domain, most existing multi-source domain adaptation (MSDA) models are trained on data from all domains jointly in one step. Such an one-step approach limits their ability to adapt to the target domain. This is because the training set is dominated by the more numerous and labeled source domain data. The source-domain-bias can potentially be alleviated by introducing a second training step, where the model is fine-tuned with the unlabeled target domain data only using pseudo labels as supervision. However, the pseudo labels are inevitably noisy and when used unchecked can negatively impact the model performance. To address this problem, we propose a novel Bi-level Optimization based Robust Target Training (BORT²) method for MSDA. Given any existing fully-trained one-step MSDA model, BORT² turns it to a labeling function to generate pseudo-labels for the target data and trains a target model using pseudo-labeled target data only. Crucially, the target model is a stochastic CNN which is designed to be intrinsically robust against label noise generated by the labeling function. Such a stochastic CNN models each target instance feature as a Gaussian distribution with an entropy maximization regularizer deployed to measure the label uncertainty, which is further exploited to alleviate the negative impact of noisy pseudo labels. Training the labeling function and the target model poses a nested bi-level optimization problem, for which we formulate an elegant solution based on implicit differentiation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed method achieves the state of the art performance on three MSDA benchmarks, including the large-scale DomainNet dataset. Our code will be available at \url{https://github.com/Zhongying-Deng/BORT2}

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 1 sample are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from zhongying-deng/bort2. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections