Papers › Robust estimation of carbon dioxide airborne fraction under measurement errors

Robust estimation of carbon dioxide airborne fraction under measurement errors

12 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.07836links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

J. Eduardo Vera-Valdés, Charisios Grivas

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This paper discusses the effect of measurement errors in the estimation of the carbon dioxide (CO₂) airborne fraction. We are the first to present regression-based estimates and standard errors that are robust to measurement errors for the extended model, the preferred specification to estimate the CO₂ airborne fraction. To achieve this goal, we add to the literature in three ways: i) We generalise the Deming regression to handle multiple variables. ii) We introduce a bootstrap approach to construct confidence intervals for Deming regression in both univariate and multivariate scenarios. iii) Propose to estimate the airborne fraction using instrumental variables (IV), taking advantage of the variation of additional measurements, to obtain consistent estimates that are robust to measurement errors. IV estimates for the airborne fraction are 44.8%(± 1.4%; 1σ) for the simple specification, and 47.3%(± 1.1%; 1σ) for the extended specification. We show that these estimates are not statistically different from the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates, while being robust to measurement errors without relying on additional assumptions. In contrast, OLS estimates are shown to fall outside the confidence interval of the Deming regression estimates.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections