Papers › RLIPv2: Fast Scaling of Relational Language-Image Pre-training
RLIPv2: Fast Scaling of Relational Language-Image Pre-training
Hangjie Yuan, Shiwei Zhang, Xiang Wang, Samuel Albanie, Yining Pan, Tao Feng, Jianwen Jiang, Dong Ni, Yingya Zhang, Deli Zhao
Relational Language-Image Pre-training (RLIP) aims to align vision representations with relational texts, thereby advancing the capability of relational reasoning in computer vision tasks. However, hindered by the slow convergence of RLIPv1 architecture and the limited availability of existing scene graph data, scaling RLIPv1 is challenging. In this paper, we propose RLIPv2, a fast converging model that enables the scaling of relational pre-training to large-scale pseudo-labelled scene graph data. To enable fast scaling, RLIPv2 introduces Asymmetric Language-Image Fusion (ALIF), a mechanism that facilitates earlier and deeper gated cross-modal fusion with sparsified language encoding layers. ALIF leads to comparable or better performance than RLIPv1 in a fraction of the time for pre-training and fine-tuning. To obtain scene graph data at scale, we extend object detection datasets with free-form relation labels by introducing a captioner (e.g., BLIP) and a designed Relation Tagger. The Relation Tagger assigns BLIP-generated relation texts to region pairs, thus enabling larger-scale relational pre-training. Through extensive experiments conducted on Human-Object Interaction Detection and Scene Graph Generation, RLIPv2 shows state-of-the-art performance on three benchmarks under fully-finetuning, few-shot and zero-shot settings. Notably, the largest RLIPv2 achieves 23.29mAP on HICO-DET without any fine-tuning, yields 32.22mAP with just 1% data and yields 45.09mAP with 100% data. Code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/JacobYuan7/RLIPv2.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.09351")
Code
Syntology Ran 22 of 30 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 18 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 8 ran; community (archive-listed): 20 samples from 2 repositories, 14 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
30 samples harvested; 22 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 30 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
2303ca2dfb7c411f · report
5425cd58fc9f60ff · report
de2f09364131391c · report
46b10090febf5d85 · report
45e4eb399a99d475 · report
be161ebd7c1a3d07 · report
5e1b3b1dd052111f · report
34ca1776c2c6b50f · report
9b06d4ed21a99088 · report
e040382fdc48b50a · report
4a630df05e78ca0c · report
4621c1ee7b2ff5e6 · report
b3b492f41ac84c02 · report
5d8915fe61383bce · report
cf0fda09312fb592 · report
107ffdb07dbd2f9d · report
c03e17b75656115f · report
b66569473e9784e1 · report
ac8fe530cdad4d8c · report
5dad3494aed8377b · report
1d2943763d1f2ef8 · report
6e3e0dbceafbf01c · report
d6d0aa8ce6bedcbb · report
5c0711aada67957e · report
66064a88a6ab62de · report
64cee3e52db36a85 · report
4107165e358237d6 · report
9a524c433c47ed10 · report
5f199ad5ac482895 · report
3755b0f2896c9d66 · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human-Object Interaction Detection | HICO-DET | RLIPv2 (Swin-L) | mAP | 45.09 | #2 of 55 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human-Object Interaction Detection | V-COCO | RLIPv2 | AP(S1) | 72.1 | #1 of 34 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Human-Object Interaction Detection | V-COCO | RLIPv2 | AP(S2) | 74.1 | #1 of 34 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections