Papers › RLeave: an in silico cross-validation protocol for transcript differential expression analysis

RLeave: an in silico cross-validation protocol for transcript differential expression analysis

10 Dec 2020arXiv:2012.05421links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Matheus Costa e Silva, Norma Lucena-Silva, Juliana Doblas Massaro, Eduardo Antônio Donadi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Background and Objective: The massive parallel sequencing technology facilitates new discoveries in terms of transcript differential analysis; however, all the new findings must be validated, since the diversity of transcript expression may impair the identification of the most relevant ones. Methods: The proposed RLeave algorithm (implemented in the R environment) utilizes a combination of conventional analysis (classic edgeR) together with other mathematical methods (Leave-one-out sample technique and Decision Trees validation) to identify more relevant candidates to be in vitro or in silico validated. Results: The RLeave protocol was tested using miRNome expression analysis of two sample groups (diabetes mellitus and acute lymphoblastic leukemia), and both had their most important differentially expressed miRNA confirmed by RT-qPCR. Conclusion: This protocol is applicable in RNA-SEQ research, highlighting the most relevant transcripts for in silico and/or in vitro validation.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections