Papers › RLAIF-V: Open-Source AI Feedback Leads to Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness

RLAIF-V: Open-Source AI Feedback Leads to Super GPT-4V Trustworthiness

27 May 2024CVPR 2025 1arXiv:2405.17220archive 2025-07-28

Tianyu Yu, Haoye Zhang, Qiming Li, Qixin Xu, Yuan YAO, Da Chen, Xiaoman Lu, Ganqu Cui, Yunkai Dang, Taiwen He, Xiaocheng Feng, Jun Song, Bo Zheng, Zhiyuan Liu, Tat-Seng Chua, Maosong Sun

Traditional feedback learning for hallucination reduction relies on labor-intensive manual labeling or expensive proprietary models. This leaves the community without foundational knowledge about how to build high-quality feedback with open-source MLLMs. In this work, we introduce RLAIF-V, a novel framework that aligns MLLMs in a fully open-source paradigm. RLAIF-V maximally explores open-source MLLMs from two perspectives, including high-quality feedback data generation for preference learning and self-feedback guidance for inference-time scaling. Extensive experiments on six benchmarks in both automatic and human evaluation show that RLAIF-V substantially enhances the trustworthiness of models at both preference learning and inference time. RLAIF-V 7B reduces object hallucination by 80.7\% and overall hallucination by 33.7\%. Remarkably, RLAIF-V 12B further reveals the self-alignment potential of open-source MLLMs, where the model can learn from feedback of itself to achieve super GPT-4V trustworthiness.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2405.17220")

Code

Syntology Ran 14 of 22 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · violated contract; 6 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 15 samples from 2 repositories, 8 ran; community (archive-listed): 7 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

openbmb/omnilmm officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
rlhf-v/rlaif-v officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
OpenBMB/MiniCPM-o mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
openbmb/minicpm-v mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
rlhf-v/rlhf-v mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

22 samples harvested; 14 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · violated contract
6ran · our draft was wrong
3ran · fixture could not drive it
3ran
8unverified

Licence: 8 of the 22 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

autocontrast_func openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/model/utils.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a95e6290546a4d45 · report
equalize_func openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/model/utils.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it Apache-2.0 (permissive) · eb4f4c5587a11a2c · report
expand_question_into_multimodal rlhf-v/rlaif-v/chat.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · f067ba49686d26ba · report
get_2d_sincos_pos_embed openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/model/resampler.py official repository ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 77e8a3ac46f3afec · report
get_abs_pos openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/model/resampler.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 50c4398a8645438a · report
get_parameter_number openbmb/omnilmm/finetune/finetune.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 1a3baf406bc7de64 · report
identity_func openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/model/utils.py official repository ran · violated contract fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 1dd2ab205689d45b · report
upload_img openbmb/omnilmm/web_demos/web_demo.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2a1ffa5243150412 · report
conversation_to_ids openbmb/omnilmm/finetune/dataset.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a32cd6f57d6772ae · report
conversation_to_ids_minicpm openbmb/omnilmm/finetune/dataset.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · d6c1484ab50b4e26 · report
data_collator openbmb/omnilmm/finetune/dataset.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 4212780bf7da9ddd · report
get_2d_sincos_pos_embed_from_grid openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/model/resampler.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 2884deadbb637c3e · report
omni_preprocess openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/train/train_utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · b474c783b31ec8ac · report
pretty_print_semaphore openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 37899f22fb191b37 · report
violates_moderation openbmb/omnilmm/omnilmm/utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · f9939a84b9a65279 · report
cal_informative rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/summarize_gpt_mmhal_review.py community (archive-listed) ran no licence file found · pointer only · 03a2b1b7f5fd092e · report
combine_coco_captions rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/eval_gpt_obj_halbench.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 25585704d77cafb4 · report
parse_object_list rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/eval_gpt_obj_halbench.py community (archive-listed) ran no licence file found · pointer only · 160038ef11a44314 · report
parse_score rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/eval_gpt_review_llava.py community (archive-listed) ran · violated contract fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 763f6fe20bd52fbb · report
preprocess_coh_results rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/eval_gpt_obj_halbench.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · f7745bc5cafc18b6 · report
read_json rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/change_mmhal_predict_template.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · f8c65c92ec213846 · report
get_eval rlhf-v/rlhf-v/eval/gpt4_grpc.py community (archive-listed) unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 77010a13f8bd8d11 · report

Tasks

HallucinationImage CaptioningObject HallucinationVisual Question Answering

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

RLAIF-V Dataset

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Captioning Object HalBench RLAIF-V 7B chair_i 4.3 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning Object HalBench RLAIF-V 7B chair_s 8.5 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning Object HalBench RLAIF-V 12B chair_i 1.8 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning Object HalBench RLAIF-V 12B chair_s 3.3 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering AMBER RLAIF-V 12B Accuracy 88 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering AMBER RLAIF-V 12B F1 90.9 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering MMHal-Bench RLAIF-V 12B Hallucination Rate 29.2 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering MMHal-Bench RLAIF-V 12B Score 3.36 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering MMHal-Bench RLAIF-V 7B Hallucination Rate 29.2 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering MMHal-Bench RLAIF-V 7B Score 3.06 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections