Papers › RiverBench: an Open RDF Streaming Benchmark Suite
RiverBench: an Open RDF Streaming Benchmark Suite
Piotr Sowinski, Maria Ganzha, Marcin Paprzycki
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
RDF streaming has been explored by the Semantic Web community from many angles, resulting in multiple task formulations and streaming methods. However, for many existing formulations of the problem, reliably benchmarking streaming solutions has been challenging due to the lack of well-described and appropriately diverse benchmark datasets. Existing datasets and evaluations, except a few notable cases, suffer from unclear streaming task scopes, underspecified benchmarks, and errors in the data. To address these issues, we propose RiverBench, an open and collaborative RDF streaming benchmark suite. RiverBench leverages continuous, community-driven processes, established best practices (e.g., FAIR), and built-in quality guarantees. The suite distributes datasets in a common, accessible format, with clear documentation, licensing, and machine-readable metadata. The current release includes a diverse collection of non-synthetic datasets generated by the Semantic Web community, representing many applications of RDF data streaming, all major task formulations, and emerging RDF features (RDF-star). Finally, we present a list of research applications for the suite, demonstrating its versatility and value even beyond the realm of RDF streaming.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections