Papers › Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winners

Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winners

25 Nov 2019ICML 2020 1arXiv:1911.11134archive 2025-07-28

Utku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro, Erich Elsen

Many applications require sparse neural networks due to space or inference time restrictions. There is a large body of work on training dense networks to yield sparse networks for inference, but this limits the size of the largest trainable sparse model to that of the largest trainable dense model. In this paper we introduce a method to train sparse neural networks with a fixed parameter count and a fixed computational cost throughout training, without sacrificing accuracy relative to existing dense-to-sparse training methods. Our method updates the topology of the sparse network during training by using parameter magnitudes and infrequent gradient calculations. We show that this approach requires fewer floating-point operations (FLOPs) to achieve a given level of accuracy compared to prior techniques. We demonstrate state-of-the-art sparse training results on a variety of networks and datasets, including ResNet-50, MobileNets on Imagenet-2012, and RNNs on WikiText-103. Finally, we provide some insights into why allowing the topology to change during the optimization can overcome local minima encountered when the topology remains static. Code used in our work can be found in github.com/google-research/rigl.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1911.11134")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

google-research/rigl officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report
varun19299/rigl-reproducibility officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Shiweiliuiiiiiii/GraNet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
calgaryml/condensed-sparsity mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
hyeon95y/sparselinear mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
nollied/rigl-torch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
stevenboys/agent mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
stevenboys/moon mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
verbose-avocado/rigl-torch mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
vita-group/granet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · fixture could not drive it

Licence: 0 of the 1 sample are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from hyeon95y/sparselinear. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

small_world_chunker hyeon95y/sparselinear/sparselinear/sparselinear.py community (archive-listed) ran · fixture could not drive it fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 3a0749baa452d466 · report

Tasks

AllImage ClassificationLanguage ModellingSparse Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Sparse Learning ImageNet Resnet-50: 80% Sparse Top-1 Accuracy 77.1 #1 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Sparse Learning ImageNet Resnet-50: 90% Sparse Top-1 Accuracy 76.4 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Sparse Learning ImageNet MobileNet-v1: 75% Sparse Top-1 Accuracy 71.9 #7 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Sparse Learning ImageNet MobileNet-v1: 90% Sparse Top-1 Accuracy 68.1 #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: RigL

RigL

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections