Papers › RFFNet: Large-Scale Interpretable Kernel Methods via Random Fourier Features
RFFNet: Large-Scale Interpretable Kernel Methods via Random Fourier Features
Mateus P. Otto, Rafael Izbicki
Kernel methods provide a flexible and theoretically grounded approach to nonlinear and nonparametric learning. While memory and run-time requirements hinder their applicability to large datasets, many low-rank kernel approximations, such as random Fourier features, were recently developed to scale up such kernel methods. However, these scalable approaches are based on approximations of isotropic kernels, which cannot remove the influence of irrelevant features. In this work, we design random Fourier features for a family of automatic relevance determination (ARD) kernels, and introduce RFFNet, a new large-scale kernel method that learns the kernel relevances' on the fly via first-order stochastic optimization. We present an effective initialization scheme for the method's non-convex objective function, evaluate if hard-thresholding RFFNet's learned relevances yield a sensible rule for variable selection, and perform an extensive ablation study of RFFNet's components. Numerical validation on simulated and real-world data shows that our approach has a small memory footprint and run-time, achieves low prediction error, and effectively identifies relevant features, thus leading to more interpretable solutions. We supply users with an efficient, PyTorch-based library, that adheres to the scikit-learn standard API and code for fully reproducing our results.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections