Papers › Revisiting Training-free NAS Metrics: An Efficient Training-based Method
Revisiting Training-free NAS Metrics: An Efficient Training-based Method
Taojiannan Yang, Linjie Yang, Xiaojie Jin, Chen Chen
Recent neural architecture search (NAS) works proposed training-free metrics to rank networks which largely reduced the search cost in NAS. In this paper, we revisit these training-free metrics and find that: (1) the number of parameters (\#Param), which is the most straightforward training-free metric, is overlooked in previous works but is surprisingly effective, (2) recent training-free metrics largely rely on the \#Param information to rank networks. Our experiments show that the performance of recent training-free metrics drops dramatically when the \#Param information is not available. Motivated by these observations, we argue that metrics less correlated with the \#Param are desired to provide additional information for NAS. We propose a light-weight training-based metric which has a weak correlation with the \#Param while achieving better performance than training-free metrics at a lower search cost. Specifically, on DARTS search space, our method completes searching directly on ImageNet in only 2.6 GPU hours and achieves a top-1/top-5 error rate of 24.1\%/7.1\%, which is competitive among state-of-the-art NAS methods. Codes are available at \url{https://github.com/taoyang1122/Revisit_TrainingFree_NAS}
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections