Papers › Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuning
Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuning
Yuzhu Wang, Lechao Cheng, Chaowei Fang, Dingwen Zhang, Manni Duan, Meng Wang
Visual prompt tuning (VPT) is a promising solution incorporating learnable prompt tokens to customize pre-trained models for downstream tasks. However, VPT and its variants often encounter challenges like prompt initialization, prompt length, and subpar performance in self-supervised pretraining, hindering successful contextual adaptation. This study commences by exploring the correlation evolvement between prompts and patch tokens during proficient training. Inspired by the observation that the prompt tokens tend to share high mutual information with patch tokens, we propose initializing prompts with downstream token prototypes. The strategic initialization, a stand-in for the previous initialization, substantially improves performance in fine-tuning. To refine further, we optimize token construction with a streamlined pipeline that maintains excellent performance with almost no increase in computational expenses compared to VPT. Exhaustive experiments show our proposed approach outperforms existing methods by a remarkable margin. For instance, it surpasses full fine-tuning in 19 out of 24 tasks, using less than 0.4% of learnable parameters on the FGVC and VTAB-1K benchmarks. Notably, our method significantly advances the adaptation for self-supervised pretraining, achieving impressive task performance gains of at least 10% to 30%. Besides, the experimental results demonstrate the proposed SPT is robust to prompt lengths and scales well with model capacity and training data size. We finally provide an insightful exploration into the amount of target data facilitating the adaptation of pre-trained models to downstream tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/WangYZ1608/Self-Prompt-Tuning.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Prompt Tuning | FGVC | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 86.00 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | FGVC | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 84.08 | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | FGVC | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 83.26 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | FGVC | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 73.95 | #7 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Natural<7>) | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 76.20 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Natural<7>) | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 74.47 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Natural<7>) | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 67.19 | #6 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Natural<7>) | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 62.53 | #7 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Specialized<4>) | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 84.95 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Specialized<4>) | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 83.93 | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Specialized<4>) | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 83.15 | #4 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Specialized<4>) | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 80.90 | #7 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Structured<8>) | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 59.23 | #1 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Structured<8>) | SPT-Deep(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 58.36 | #2 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Structured<8>) | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MoCo_v3_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 55.16 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Visual Prompt Tuning | VTAB-1k(Structured<8>) | SPT-Shallow(ViT-B/16_MAE_pretrained_ImageNet-1K) | Mean Accuracy | 53.46 | #4 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections