Papers › Revisiting the Auxiliary Data in Backdoor Purification
Revisiting the Auxiliary Data in Backdoor Purification
Shaokui Wei, Shanchao Yang, Jiayin Liu, Hongyuan Zha
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Backdoor attacks occur when an attacker subtly manipulates machine learning models during the training phase, leading to unintended behaviors when specific triggers are present. To mitigate such emerging threats, a prevalent strategy is to cleanse the victim models by various backdoor purification techniques. Despite notable achievements, current state-of-the-art (SOTA) backdoor purification techniques usually rely on the availability of a small clean dataset, often referred to as auxiliary dataset. However, acquiring an ideal auxiliary dataset poses significant challenges in real-world applications. This study begins by assessing the SOTA backdoor purification techniques across different types of real-world auxiliary datasets. Our findings indicate that the purification effectiveness fluctuates significantly depending on the type of auxiliary dataset used. Specifically, a high-quality in-distribution auxiliary dataset is essential for effective purification, whereas datasets from varied or out-of-distribution sources significantly degrade the defensive performance. Based on this, we propose Guided Input Calibration (GIC), which aims to improve purification efficacy by employing a learnable transformation. Guided by the victim model itself, GIC aligns the characteristics of the auxiliary dataset with those of the original training set. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that GIC can substantially enhance purification performance across diverse types of auxiliary datasets. The code and data will be available via https://github.com/shawkui/BackdoorBenchER.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections