Papers › Revisiting Rainbow: Promoting more Insightful and Inclusive Deep Reinforcement...

Revisiting Rainbow: Promoting more Insightful and Inclusive Deep Reinforcement Learning Research

20 Nov 2020arXiv:2011.14826archive 2025-07-28

Johan S. Obando-Ceron, Pablo Samuel Castro

Since the introduction of DQN, a vast majority of reinforcement learning research has focused on reinforcement learning with deep neural networks as function approximators. New methods are typically evaluated on a set of environments that have now become standard, such as Atari 2600 games. While these benchmarks help standardize evaluation, their computational cost has the unfortunate side effect of widening the gap between those with ample access to computational resources, and those without. In this work we argue that, despite the community's emphasis on large-scale environments, the traditional small-scale environments can still yield valuable scientific insights and can help reduce the barriers to entry for underprivileged communities. To substantiate our claims, we empirically revisit the paper which introduced the Rainbow algorithm [Hessel et al., 2018] and present some new insights into the algorithms used by Rainbow.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

JohanSamir/revisiting_rainbow officialmentioned on GitHubjax report
JohanSamir/rainbow_extend mentioned on GitHubjax report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Atari GamesDeep Reinforcement LearningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)reinforcement-learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ConvolutionDQNDense ConnectionsQ-Learning

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections