Papers › Revisiting and modeling power-law distributions in empirical outage data of power systems
Revisiting and modeling power-law distributions in empirical outage data of power systems
Bálint Hartmann, Shengfeng Deng, Géza Ódor, Jeffrey Kelling
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The size distribution of planned and forced outages and following restoration times in power systems have been studied for almost two decades and has drawn great interest as they display heavy tails. Understanding of this phenomenon has been done by various threshold models, which are self-tuned at their critical points, but as many papers pointed out, explanations are intuitive, and more empirical data is needed to support hypotheses. In this paper, the authors analyze outage data collected from various public sources to calculate the outage energy and outage duration exponents of possible power-law fits. Temporal thresholds are applied to identify crossovers from initial short-time behavior to power-law tails. We revisit and add to the possible explanations of the uniformness of these exponents. By performing power spectral analyses on the outage event time series and the outage duration time series, it is found that, on the one hand, while being overwhelmed by white noise, outage events show traits of self-organized criticality (SOC), which may be modeled by a crossover from random percolation to directed percolation branching process with dissipation, coupled to a conserved density. On the other hand, in responses to outages, the heavy tails in outage duration distributions could be a consequence of the highly optimized tolerance (HOT) mechanism, based on the optimized allocation of maintenance resources.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections