Papers › Revisiting PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics-informed Neural Networks and...

Revisiting PINNs: Generative Adversarial Physics-informed Neural Networks and Point-weighting Method

18 May 2022arXiv:2205.08754archive 2025-07-28

Wensheng Li, Chao Zhang, Chuncheng Wang, Hanting Guan, DaCheng Tao

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a deep learning framework for numerically solving partial differential equations (PDEs), and have been widely used in a variety of PDE problems. However, there still remain some challenges in the application of PINNs: 1) the mechanism of PINNs is unsuitable (at least cannot be directly applied) to exploiting a small size of (usually very few) extra informative samples to refine the networks; and 2) the efficiency of training PINNs often becomes low for some complicated PDEs. In this paper, we propose the generative adversarial physics-informed neural network (GA-PINN), which integrates the generative adversarial (GA) mechanism with the structure of PINNs, to improve the performance of PINNs by exploiting only a small size of exact solutions to the PDEs. Inspired from the weighting strategy of the Adaboost method, we then introduce a point-weighting (PW) method to improve the training efficiency of PINNs, where the weight of each sample point is adaptively updated at each training iteration. The numerical experiments show that GA-PINNs outperform PINNs in many well-known PDEs and the PW method also improves the efficiency of training PINNs and GA-PINNs.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Liwgreat/GA-PINN officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections