Papers › Revisiting Latent-Space Interpolation via a Quantitative Evaluation Framework
Revisiting Latent-Space Interpolation via a Quantitative Evaluation Framework
Lu Mi, Tianxing He, Core Francisco Park, Hao Wang, Yue Wang, Nir Shavit
Latent-space interpolation is commonly used to demonstrate the generalization ability of deep latent variable models. Various algorithms have been proposed to calculate the best trajectory between two encodings in the latent space. In this work, we show how data labeled with semantically continuous attributes can be utilized to conduct a quantitative evaluation of latent-space interpolation algorithms, for variational autoencoders. Our framework can be used to complement the standard qualitative comparison, and also enables evaluation for domains (such as graph) in which the visualization is difficult. Interestingly, our experiments reveal that the superiority of interpolation algorithms could be domain-dependent. While normalised interpolation works best for the image domain, spherical linear interpolation achieves the best performance in the graph domain. Next, we propose a simple-yet-effective method to restrict the latent space via a bottleneck structure in the encoder. We find that all interpolation algorithms evaluated in this work can benefit from this restriction. Finally, we conduct interpolation-aware training with the labeled attributes, and show that this explicit supervision can improve the interpolation performance.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections