Papers › Revisiting inverse Hessian vector products for calculating influence functions

Revisiting inverse Hessian vector products for calculating influence functions

25 Sep 2024arXiv:2409.17357archive 2025-07-28

Yegor Klochkov, Yang Liu

Influence functions are a popular tool for attributing a model's output to training data. The traditional approach relies on the calculation of inverse Hessian-vector products (iHVP), but the classical solver "Linear time Stochastic Second-order Algorithm" (LiSSA, Agarwal et al. (2017)) is often deemed impractical for large models due to expensive computation and hyperparameter tuning. We show that the three hyperparameters -- the scaling factor, the batch size, and the number of steps -- can be chosen depending on the spectral properties of the Hessian, particularly its trace and largest eigenvalue. By evaluating with random sketching (Swartworth and Woodruff, 2023), we find that the batch size has to be sufficiently large for LiSSA to converge; however, for all of the models we consider, the requirement is mild. We confirm our findings empirically by comparing to Proximal Bregman Retraining Functions (PBRF, Bae et al. (2022)). Finally, we discuss what role the inverse Hessian plays in calculating the influence.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections