Papers › Revisiting AP Loss for Dense Object Detection: Adaptive Ranking Pair Selection

Revisiting AP Loss for Dense Object Detection: Adaptive Ranking Pair Selection

25 Jul 2022CVPR 2022 1arXiv:2207.12042archive 2025-07-28

Dongli Xu, Jinhong Deng, Wen Li

Average precision (AP) loss has recently shown promising performance on the dense object detection task. However,a deep understanding of how AP loss affects the detector from a pairwise ranking perspective has not yet been developed.In this work, we revisit the average precision (AP)loss and reveal that the crucial element is that of selecting the ranking pairs between positive and negative samples.Based on this observation, we propose two strategies to improve the AP loss. The first of these is a novel Adaptive Pairwise Error (APE) loss that focusing on ranking pairs in both positive and negative samples. Moreover,we select more accurate ranking pairs by exploiting the normalized ranking scores and localization scores with a clustering algorithm. Experiments conducted on the MSCOCO dataset support our analysis and demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method compared with current classification and ranking loss. The code is available at https://github.com/Xudangliatiger/APE-Loss.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

xudangliatiger/ape-loss officialmentioned in paperpytorchNOASSERTION report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Dense Object DetectionObject Detectionobject-detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections