Papers › Revisiting and Maximizing Temporal Knowledge in Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation
Revisiting and Maximizing Temporal Knowledge in Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation
WooSeok Shin, Hyun Joon Park, Jin Sob Kim, Sung Won Han
In semi-supervised semantic segmentation, the Mean Teacher- and co-training-based approaches are employed to mitigate confirmation bias and coupling problems. However, despite their high performance, these approaches frequently involve complex training pipelines and a substantial computational burden, limiting the scalability and compatibility of these methods. In this paper, we propose a PrevMatch framework that effectively mitigates the aforementioned limitations by maximizing the utilization of the temporal knowledge obtained during the training process. The PrevMatch framework relies on two core strategies: (1) we reconsider the use of temporal knowledge and thus directly utilize previous models obtained during training to generate additional pseudo-label guidance, referred to as previous guidance. (2) we design a highly randomized ensemble strategy to maximize the effectiveness of the previous guidance. Experimental results on four benchmark semantic segmentation datasets confirm that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing methods across various evaluation protocols. In particular, with DeepLabV3+ and ResNet-101 network settings, PrevMatch outperforms the existing state-of-the-art method, Diverse Co-training, by +1.6 mIoU on Pascal VOC with only 92 annotated images, while achieving 2.4 times faster training. Furthermore, the results indicate that PrevMatch induces stable optimization, particularly in benefiting classes that exhibit poor performance. Code is available at https://github.com/wooseok-shin/PrevMatch
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2405.20610")
Code
Syntology Ran 6 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from wooseok-shin/PrevMatch. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
392d0834780485a1 · report
6ef392f365cc5703 · report
794a2ed91a5175bd · report
7a9f64d049e9d81e · report
f57298b14577ea23 · report
7c60f8e4d3bbd46f · report
21e12abf73350be0 · report
9e96d1dddb1f71af · report
5717ec3a3f33f0a8 · report
1c0a6c3a9a739ec2 · report
73ea75af76a62e43 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | COCO 1/128 labeled | PrevMatch | Validation mIoU | 45.7 | #3 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | COCO 1/256 labeled | PrevMatch | Validation mIoU | 40.2 | #6 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | COCO 1/64 labeled | PrevMatch | Validation mIoU | 48.4 | #5 of 9 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 12.5% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 78.9% | #3 of 33 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 12.5% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 77.8% | #9 of 33 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 25% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 80.1% | #3 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 25% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 78.8% | #11 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 50% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 80.1% | #8 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 50% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 79.2% | #13 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 6.25% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 77.7% | #3 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Cityscapes 6.25% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 75.8% | #11 of 18 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 1464 labels | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 81.6 | #8 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 1464 labels | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 79.3 | #13 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 183 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 78.5 | #7 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 183 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 75.4 | #12 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 25% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 80.8 | #6 of 27 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 366 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 79.6 | #7 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 366 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 77.5 | #12 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 732 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 80.4 | #8 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 732 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 78.6 | #12 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 92 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 77.0 | #7 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 92 labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-50) | Validation mIoU | 73.4 | #12 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Pascal VOC 2012 12.5% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 81.9 | #5 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation | Pascal VOC 2012 6.25% labeled | PrevMatch (ResNet-101) | Validation mIoU | 81.4 | #4 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections