Papers › Revisit Recurrent Attention Model from an Active Sampling Perspective

Revisit Recurrent Attention Model from an Active Sampling Perspective

11 Sep 2019NeurIPS Workshop Neuro_AI 2019 12archive 2025-07-28

Jialin Lu

We revisit the Recurrent Attention Model (RAM, Mnih et al. (2014)), a recurrent neural network for visual attention, from an active information sampling perspective. We borrow ideas from neuroscience research on the role of active information sampling in the context of visual attention and gaze (Gottlieb, 2018), where the author suggested three types of motives for active information sampling strategies. We find the original RAM model only implements one of them. We identify three key weakness of the original RAM and provide a simple solution by adding two extra terms on the objective function. The modified RAM 1) achieves faster convergence, 2) allows dynamic decision making per sample without loss of accuracy, and 3) generalizes much better on longer sequence of glimpses which is not trained for, compared with the original RAM.

PaperPDFCode

Code

luxxxlucy/recurrent-attention-model-revisited officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Decision Making

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections