Papers › Revealing the Distributional Vulnerability of Discriminators by Implicit Generators

Revealing the Distributional Vulnerability of Discriminators by Implicit Generators

23 Aug 2021arXiv:2108.09976archive 2025-07-28

Zhilin Zhao, Longbing Cao, Kun-Yu Lin

In deep neural learning, a discriminator trained on in-distribution (ID) samples may make high-confidence predictions on out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. This triggers a significant matter for robust, trustworthy and safe deep learning. The issue is primarily caused by the limited ID samples observable in training the discriminator when OOD samples are unavailable. We propose a general approach for \textit{fine-tuning discriminators by implicit generators} (FIG). FIG is grounded on information theory and applicable to standard discriminators without retraining. It improves the ability of a standard discriminator in distinguishing ID and OOD samples by generating and penalizing its specific OOD samples. According to the Shannon entropy, an energy-based implicit generator is inferred from a discriminator without extra training costs. Then, a Langevin dynamic sampler draws specific OOD samples for the implicit generator. Lastly, we design a regularizer fitting the design principle of the implicit generator to induce high entropy on those generated OOD samples. The experiments on different networks and datasets demonstrate that FIG achieves the state-of-the-art OOD detection performance.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

19 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 13 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 19 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from lawliet-zzl/fig. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections